In the world of frameworks, figuring out Angular vs Meteor vs Ember may be daunting. There are cons and pros, full-stack vs. minimalist, data-driven or API-driven. Usually, when a programmer chooses one framework over another, it means that it fits the specific expectations for the app. Let’s consider their key features to identify whether this is a good match for your project.
Angular vs Meteor vs Ember
AngularJS was created in 2009 as a part of a bigger commercial product – GetAngular. Amongst Angular’s unique features are dependency injection, two-way data bindings, easy-to-test code and expanding the HTML dialect.
Angular has an impressive community of followers that brings a big knowledge base and support from the peers. Some developers say that if you already have a SQL database, Angular is greater than Meteor, because you can take your own back-end.
Angular.js is often named as a Model-View-Whatever framework and these are key advantages: simple testing, fast code production, and two-way data binding. Nowadays, it is called as JS framework for Single-Page Applications development.
It has such well-known customers like Forbes, GoDaddy, Ford, Udemy, NBA, The Oscars, etc. The key countries where it is searched are Belarus, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Israel.
Both AngularJS and Angular can be used to develop mobile apps by applying tools for hybrid app development. For example, it mixes AngularJS and Bootstrap to develop a hybrid app in the same way as web app development. So, programmers may immediately start using the framework to develop mobile apps.
- Programmers may use their own back-end and database
- An ability to connect the views and models
- The entire Model-View-Whatever concept feels very common.
- This framework fits for those programmers who start from scratch.
- It synchronizes automatically the model and view.
- Well-documented architecture.
- An ability to develop custom elements.
- Simplify application testing.
- Supported by Google which brings more innovations.
- A big community that is always ready to respond and help to solve issues.
- A good fit for animations.
- Good at connecting user behavior to the DOM.
- Programmers make fewer bugs due to the support of the community and permanent improvement.
- The programmers don’t require to know the system’s state to work.
- Development of customized Document Object Model elements.
- Simple alteration and UI design.
- When developing input fields in an HTML document, a data binding is made for every rendered field. Angular checks every single bound field on the page for any updates.
- It is easy-to-test code.
- The framework contributes expansion of HTML syntax and develops reusable components.
- It applies binding expressions in HTML attributes to boost the templating functionality. This framework has a deep understanding of the DOM, and it has a good structure of the templates to decrease the entire code demanded to develop the resulting page.
- Data modeling helps to make the code easy to test and simple.
- Quick when rendering static lists.
- Angular libraries make this framework good with code reuse.
- No backward compatibility.
- Programmers need to learn TypeScript.
- It is not SEO-friendly because needed for indexing texts are not in HTML directly. It can be solved with server rendering features.
- It doesn’t have a command line tool (Meteor has).
- It requires to learn new vocabulary.
- Too authentic: programmers need to align their actions with the system’s features. Meteor is simpler to adapt for the senior developers.
- Programmers don’t understand what’s going on during the coding process.
- It demands difficult background knowledge.
- Challenges with debugging scopes.
- The negative influence of various DOM elements on productivity.
- It is challenging to work with the directives API.
- This framework can be slow for pages with a lot of interactive elements.
- The original design can be time-consuming.
- Troubles with performance due to the document object model elements.
- Difficult third-party integration.
- Complex learning curve.
- Scopes are difficult to debug.
- The router is bounded.
Meteor with angular 2 can allow you to build a messaging app because their features can be successfully supplemented. So, feel free to consider this option as well.
Ember is one more full framework applied in production by the large companies but it has no main corporate backer. The way it is distributed and packaged complicate tracking process.
- It is launched in 2011 and was named the best 4 years later. Ember is a good fit for those who want to develop complex software system or for a startup.It has a big and active community. Ember is permanently upgraded. Its benefits have been appreciated by ZenDesk, Yahoo, Groupon, Microsoft, TED, KickStarter, etc. The main audience is programmers from India, Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany.
- Large in size.
- Big and proactive community.
- Permanent development of features.
- The high-level structure that may guide to code breaks.
- Easy to learn.
- Stable performance.
- The opportunity of self-configuration.
- Two-way data binding.
- Quick speed of run and load.
- Nested UIs.
- This framework minimizes DOM.
- Inherent stability and quicker boot times.
- Performance focus.
- Friendly API and docs.
- Data layer integrates with Java.
- Excellent routing.
- Route handlers for the URLs may notice a wide range of possible application states.
- Greater performance because common tasks are supplemented to a batch.
- This framework helps with writing modular and simple code by applying Promises.
- Full front-end stack.
- Unique CLI tool.
- This framework works well with jQuery and can use its features.
- Minimal demand for configuration.
- Debugging tool for each web browser.
- This framework helps programmers with saving the structure of the app simple and clean.
- Advanced bindings.
- It applies easily to understand and clean templating engine.
- This framework helps developing products instead of constantly configuring the stuff.
- It can’t fast process changes to the code.
- Outmoded tutorials and documentation.
- Ember doesn’t provide the dirty checking like in Angular. This framework uses getters and setters, and programmers have to remember them.
- Difficult learning curve.
- Too complex for small projects.
Meteor.js is fast and easy, even the goal is to develop difficult web apps. This framework is a good fit for the specific goals. Moreover, Meteor.js allows creating both backend and frontend components. It makes real cross-platform development with a single codebase.
It is a MVC framework for Node.js that helps to speed up the development of Android, iOS, and web apps. This is a good fit if you need to create a refresh button, collaborative applications, social networking websites or when users require instantaneous updates.
From a technical point of view, it is reactive because of its methods for upgrading data. To upgrade the data in the UI, it copies a lot of the MongoDB databases. Any upgrades to data will happen live in the app because of the Meteor’s features. Nowadays, you may also use third-party packages. Here you can find them: Atmosphere.js.
Meteor can render new data in the browser without additional actions. By operating the HTML in the browser, the user notices an upgraded UI.
- Applies node.js in the back-end.
- Applies MongoDB for your database.
- Suggests its own hosting service and simple deploy.
- Delivers a library of key packages/modules that most apps will require.
- Supplemented with a command line tool that’s very helpful for. development.
- Includes Mustache for templating.
- If you think about Meteor vs React vs Angular, keep in mind that Meteor has swappable front-end with Angular, React and Blaze. There is a new package Reactive Native + Meteor as well that uses Meteor’s functionality.
- The system doesn’t require a lot of decisions for your components.
- This is a good fit for real-time.
- It is enough to know only one language.
- Simple hosting and deployment.
- A command-line tool.
- Very popular.
- Easy for beginners.
- It integrates with React, Angular, and Node.js, Cordova and MongoDB.
- It is an open-source and free framework with a huge number of participants on GitHub.
- Its built-in integration with Apache Cordova suggests significant business benefit.
- This framework helps to develop reactive and smaller, applications on the Node.js platform.
- Also, you can easily deploy your Meteor applications to the cloud with its subscription-based cloud deployment service, Galaxy.
- The real-time updated UIs to meet new user expectations.
- You need to adapt to the system’s requirements.
- No SQL for your database.
- A website may run slowly.
- It only syncs with the MongoDB database.
- When the app is becoming big, you have to switch to the more scalable stack.
So, let’s sum up. For those developers who like when everything happens fast, I would advise Meteor. Both Angular and AngularJS may be used to create mobile apps by using tools for hybrid application development. For instance, it combines AngularJS and Bootstrap to create a hybrid app in the same way as web app development. So, developers immediately begin using the framework to develop mobile apps.
Ember fits big companies. It has performance focus, easy to learn, and good performance because common tasks are supplemented to a batch. This framework helps developing products instead of constantly configuring the stuff.
Your company requires a better analysis?
Reach our business analysts for this.