Contemporary civilization is essentially a data-driven one. Even an ordinary person has to make decisions relying on tons of information in their work and everyday life. While data is highly important for individuals, for enterprises, it is mission-critical. It is a starting point for any analytics used to streamline business activities, retain customers, shape marketing strategies, etc. Yet, data handling is still a tough row to hoe for many organizations. Building a data warehouse (DWH) is a second-to-none approach allowing companies to facilitate data storing and processing. In this article, you will learn about DWH benefits, architecture types, and how to build a data warehouse from scratch.
Need consulting on how to develop a DWH for your enterprise?Check out what we do.
Very often, business dossiers of a company are kept in a dozen locations in the cloud and on-premises, for instance, ERP, CRM, or EHR, as well as in multiple paper-format depots. Under such conditions, accessing, retrieving, analyzing, and using data (to say nothing of providing its security) becomes a problem. Luckily, the potential of current cloud services enables enterprises to optimize data handling routines. When you build data warehouse, you pool historical and current electronic records to be stored and managed in one virtual place to be further processed and turned into actionable insights for further business intelligence endeavors.
Today, organizations can use different types of data warehouses – from small-size information banks (data marts and repositories of unstructured data or data lakes) to classical big-volume relational databases, where information is in the form of easy-to-access tables. Yet, whatever model of implementing a data warehouse you opt for, it is sure to bring your company a number of perks.
First, you obtain a reliable storage facility that unites all sources of information and rules out any possibility of data deletion. Second, being foolproof in operation and transparent in arrangement, it is simple to use even by non-tech personnel who would find it a breeze to understand its thematic, structural pattern. Third, it functions in real-time mode, enabling 24/7 data tracking, auditing, and vetting, as well as monitoring regulation compliance in the sphere of data protection and security.
Such weighty data warehouse assets are the derivatives of their peculiar makeup.
Struggling with your data flows? Build a custom data warehouse with us!Learn more about our ETL and DWH expertise.
Misled by the name, people with no experience building data warehouses may picture this solution as nothing more than a collection of Excel files housed in a cloud-based server. But this image falls utterly short of the complex and even intricate construction of even the simplest DWH.
On the front end, it is a representational UI from which users access data, employ special tools to analyze them, and share both data and analysis results with any authorized person. On the backend, beside the warehouse proper as a venue for aggregating, standardizing, and dimensionalizing data, a standard DWH contains three more components.
The first is multiple data sources (from internal ecosystems to enterprise apps) from which the diverse raw data is drawn. The second is the meta-data module that contains “data about data,” explaining what kinds of data (technical or business) are stored in the DWH and displays their interrelations. The third is a bunch of APIs that enable data integration leveraging the most efficient ELT information handling scheme when data is processed within the warehouse, not before it is fed into it as the now old-fashioned ETL model prescribed.
Having the same basic elements, data warehouses may manifest different patterns of their internal arrangement, which results in obtaining the DWH architecture of one of the three types.
This is the simplest organizational mode for a data warehouse building. In it, you just connect your data storage directly to the UI, letting users make queries and get an immediate response. Sounds perfect? Well, not really.
Issues begin to crop up if the volume of information exceeds 100GB when the query processing speed and accuracy suffer considerably. Besides, analytical capabilities and report complexity under such conditions are substandard, and the flexibility of the entire system is somewhat limited. That is why this model hardly suits large enterprises working with vast amounts of data and advanced queries.
As one can easily guess, one more architectural layer here serves as a database extension, coming between the UI and the DWH itself. It consists of several data marts, each containing only domain-specific information, dramatically simplifying query handling. Plus, such an organization enables greater data security since file access can be restricted to specific departments or employees.
The chief downsides of implementing data warehouse of this type are extra efforts to integrate data marts with the core ecosystem and the necessity to splurge on additional hardware resources.
This model gives depth to data representation and processing by arranging it in the shape of OLAP cubes instead of conventional two-dimensional tables utilized for one- and two-layer DWH structures. The cubes can be configured to access the whole data bank or each mart separately, thus giving the warehouse the utmost flexibility and security. In addition, users can move across dimensions at will, finding any data they need and subjecting it to multi-directional analysis.
Whatever architecture type you will opt for in data warehouse development, you will need a set of efficient tools to do it.
Choosing appropriate software for a DWH project ranks among the tips for building a data warehouse from scratch. Why? Because it will impact the data integration capabilities, data security, built-in connectivity with BI and analytic services, and – ultimately – the reliability of the solution you aim to develop. Here is the list of three tools that display the highest customer satisfaction performance and follow the principles of DWH modernization.
This solution is an unquestionable leader in the niche by many accounts. It provides built-in cloud data integration with Amazon S3 and federated query capability, enabling the DWH to query and analyze data of any kind, format, or size. Furthermore, the analytical power of the tool is remarkable due to the native integration with a range of AWS services honed for this purpose, such as Amazon EMR, Amazon QuickSight, AWS Lake Formation, and Amazon SageMaker, to name a few.
Data management characteristics of DWH built with this technology allow for decoupling computer and storage resources as well as for ingesting and transforming data batches and streams with the help of AWS Data Pipeline, AWS Glue, AWS Kinesis Firehose, and AWS Data Migration Services.
One of the fortes of Amazon Redshift is its focus on data safety and system security. These are safeguarded thanks to built-in disaster recovery and fault tolerance capabilities, multi-factor user authentication, data encryption, granular permission on tables, and a complete roster of compliance requirements it meets (including HIPAA, SOC1, 2, and 3, ISO 27001, PCI DSS Level 1, and more).
Finally, being a brainchild of AWS, this technology utilizes Amazon Relational Database Service to support PostgreSQL as a powerful database system popular among DWH developers.
Its native integrations embrace Azure Machine Learning, Azure Data Lake Storage, Azure Cognitive Services, Power BI, and others. Native HTAP support is affected via Azure Synapse Link. The tool enables separate scaling for computation and storage, supports big data and streaming data ingestion and processing via leveraging its Azure Stream Analytics and Apache Spark tools, and relies on Azure Data Factory to provide about a hundred native connectors to access both cloud-based and on-premises data sources. Its default security and backup features are on the same high level as is the case with the previous technology.
It can boast an even bigger number of native data integrations (over 150) as well as multi-cloud analytics support. Thanks to it, you don’t need to copy data either from Azure or AWS to query any information out of these systems. And it goes without saying that it comes with all native integrations across the entire Google Cloud Analytics ecosystem.
What differentiates this technology from the two previously mentioned ones is separate charges for storage and computing resources and cold/hot data. Moreover, its replicated storage in multiple locations is free of charge! In addition, Google BigQuery’s compliance and security measures closely follow its two counterparts in reliability and sustainability.
Of course, you can use other development tools, frameworks, and languages (such as Oracle, Bootstrap, Angular, Selenium, etc.) and collaboration software (Jira, Git, Trello, Slack, or others) that you are comfortable with.
When you have identified the tech stack for your project, the second crucial choice to make if you want to build a data warehouse is to opt for an approach to DWH creation.
You might be interested in reading a related article:Best data warehouse solutions: Professional overview by DICEUS
There are two fundamentally opposite design methods developers onboard for creating a DWH.
Also known as a top-down approach, this technique is based on building a centralized data repository as the starting point in DWH development. Separate tables with data related to a specific subject are arranged in groups that are connected with the help of joins. After this stage is accomplished, the information the repository contains is further leveraged in data mart structuring.
We recommend this method when an organization prioritizes obtaining consistent, accurate, and reliable data to serve as a single source of truth. It enables users to develop data marts promptly since no time is wasted on extracting information from original sources, cleansing it, and performing other preliminary operations with the data. However, the setup and implementation here take much time and effort compared to the second technique.
Adopting it, developers move bottom up and create dimensional data marts first. After that, you can unite them into a single enterprise data warehouse. Since the data marts are quick to normalize, developers can proceed much faster than those who prefer Inmon’s approach. On the flip side of it, you will have to repeat ETL actions and watch for a lot of redundant data in tables because each data unit is built from scratch independently.
Which method should you opt for? The choice is conditioned by the characteristics of a particular project, but in most cases, you can enjoy the best of the two approaches by combining the principles of both. Anyway, the authority of selection lies within the team of experts you hire to implement your DWH project – this is the third vital decision you must make.
More information on the topic:Leveraging enterprise data warehouse to facilitate your business efficiency
Our high-profile expertise in DWH consulting and creation is a solid ground for us to define the must-have positions you will have to fill to implement a data warehouse project.
Now that all preparatory and planning stages are over, you can proceed to the DWH project implementation.
The multiple completed DWH projects enabled DICEUS to provide a universal development strategy for creating data warehouses.
You can’t successfully develop any software solution unless you know exactly what outcome the customer expects. In the case of DWH creation, business requirements define many aspects – from the kind of data it will contain to the frequency of its usage. To understand it, we interview users and discover business goals, core processes, major issues the company faces, KPIs it steers by, types of data analysis performed by users, etc.
An essential part of the interview is the communication with the customer’s IT department, during which we figure out technical details of the software the company utilizes (like operational systems it uses, available tools to retrieve and analyze information, insights that are typically generated, and so on).
Having all the necessary information at our fingertips, we adopt an architectural approach to creating a DWH and select the optimal combination of tools to implement it. The choice of the tech stack is influenced by the current environment, expected strategic technological directions, competencies of the in-house IT team, deployment type (cloud, on-premises, or hybrid), data nature and volume, number of users, data security requirements, and more.
To create it, we apply various modeling techniques (for instance, a normalized schema or a star schema) used to organize the customer’s data into entities (real-world objects) with logical relationships between them and attributes (characteristics of these objects). Then, these logical models are transformed into database structures (tables, columns, foreign key constraints, etc.). After such modeling operations are completed, we define the source-to-target dataflow, fill the DWH with aggregated data, and control the entire process closely.
At this stage, taking thought for data access and usage policies is vital, and setting up the metadata catalog and establishing business glossaries is critical.
The implementation itself consists of several procedures. To begin with, we configure and customize the onboarded technologies (such as the DWH platform, data transformation tools, data security solutions, etc.). Secondly, ETL pipelines are developed, and data security measures are introduced. Then, all these components are integrated with the current data infrastructure, to which data from other sources is migrated afterward.
When these processes are over, we verify data legibility, accuracy, consistency, and security, test DWH’s performance, and ensure users have access to the new system and can handle it efficiently. The latter is achieved via customized training and detailed support documentation.
As a high-profile software vendor, DICEUS extends support and maintenance services to all our clients, even if they commission nothing more than a simple mobile app. In the case of such a serious solution as an enterprise data warehouse, support and maintenance are a part of the package deal. After the DWH is put into operation, we keep in touch with its owners to measure its performance metrics, fathom user satisfaction, and ensure the system’s long-term robust functioning and sustainable growth.
As you see, choosing the DWH architecture, selecting development tools, onboarding a certain approach, and implementing the project is a no-joke task that should be entrusted to professionals. Seasoned mavens of DICEUS have sufficient competence and experience to tackle such a project and deliver a high-end solution that will impress you with seamless functioning, sure to add value to your business, whatever industry you specialize in.
In the highly competitive business environment, the master of information is the master of the situation. However, many companies fail to properly use the plethora of business, product, and client data they have at their disposal. Such dossiers can be efficiently handled if they are pooled together and cleanly structured within a data warehouse. To ensure its seamless performance, you should recruit qualified experts who will map out its architecture, adopt a proper approach to its building, harness adequate software tools, and meticulously follow the DWH implementation roadmap.
Being a serious and large-scale endeavor, building a DWH is never a chump change issue. First of all, you must realize that you will have to pay not only for the implementation but for the infrastructure as well. The cost of the implementation itself is conditioned by the number of developers who will participate in the project and the hourly rate they charge for their services. The latter depends on the location of the vendor. By partnering with software developers from Eastern Europe, you will get the most optimal price/quality ratio.
It all depends on numerous factors, the most important of which is the size of the future DWH. Typically, the identification of goals takes between 3 and 20 days, while conceptualization and platform selection, as well as project road mapping, require up to 15 days each. For data architecture design, this term is the shortest while it is mostly much longer. The development itself usually lasts for about 2 months and the completed system can be launched within 2 days.
Basically, you need a team of professionals who will take care of all the necessary things they will use in the process of the DWH creation. After the preliminary analysis of your current ecosystem and your business requirements, they will select the approach to building a data warehouse, draw a strategy, identify the tools, and implement the project within the stipulated time and budget.
You start with scrutinizing business requirements and determining project goals. Then, you choose the architecture type of the future DWH and opt for the approach to build it. After that comes the turn of picking the tech stack and determining the development team roster. Next, you design the environment for the data warehouse and implement it. Finally, it is put into operation. And don’t forget about the post-launch support and maintenance.
Software solutions bringing business values
USA+16469803276 2810 N Church St,
Denmark+4531562900 Copenhagen, 2900
Poland+48789743438 ul. Księcia Witolda,
Lithuania+4366475535405 Alytus, LT-62166,
Faroe Islands+298201515 Smærugøta 9A,
UAE+4366475535405 AG Tower,